Talk:L. Sprague de Camp

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)


Photo

edit

That is NOT a photo of a man 81 years old ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.68.94.86 (talk) 22:26, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Conan the Barbarian

edit

Perhaps Conan the Barbarian should be mentioned in the lead. Perhaps de Camp should be somewhere in categories Conan the Barbarian and Robert E. Howard.

Certainly de Camp's revival of Conan and Howard needs more coverage. (And the Howard navbox should include Conan the Barbarian whom I don't find there.) There should also be some mention of de Camp's role in the 1982 "Conan" movie as a Technical consultant.

--P64 (talk) 21:13, 2 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

De Camp's involvement in Conan was just one aspect of a long, multi-faceted writing career, so I'm not sure it merits being mentioned in the lead. More coverage in the body of the article would probably be desirable.
Looking into the Conan and Howard categories, the first includes no authors and the latter only authors so closely identified with Howard (Mark Finn, Glenn Lord, Novaline Price), that the identification is really their only claim to significance. I don't see a good reason for putting de Camp in either category, particularly since his significance as an author was not dependent on Howard. I think de Camp's appearances in the navboxes Conan the Barbarian and Robert E. Howard adequately fit the bill here.
The Howard navbox apparently doesn't include Conan because it was split at some point between the box about Howard and a box on Works by Robert E. Howard. Conan is included in the latter.
BPK (talk) 13:47, 3 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I added Conan to a section heading of the former --now "Books about Howard or Conan the Barbarian" which certainly fits the listed books-- and added a cross-reference notice to the biography talk and both template talks, eg Template talk: Robert E. Howard 2#The other navigation box.
--P64 (talk) 15:48, 3 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
De Camp's involvement with Conan is covered more extensively in the article Robert E. Howard's legacy. --BPK (talk) 13:56, 3 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

As a long time fan of Robert Howard, I deem De Camp's contribution wholly negative. De Camp's completions, editings, and fatuous comments have, at best, no value; moreover readers unacquainted with De Camp's activities, may not distinguish between Howard's work and the De Camp additions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2D80:882A:0:719E:3B57:51A4:F38C (talk) 01:29, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Flags Removed

edit

This page was flagged for lack of citations/references. Since the flag notice(s) were posted, other editors have added references. I added some new ones as well, along with new content. Any further suggestions/updates welcome.--SojoQ (talk) 00:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on L. Sprague de Camp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:32, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on L. Sprague de Camp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:17, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on L. Sprague de Camp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:02, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply