Talk:Kzinti Hegemony

Latest comment: 10 years ago by EEMIV in topic Redirect

Image copyright problem with Image:Kzintiportrait.jpg edit

The image Image:Kzintiportrait.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:20, 18 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:Kzinti Patriarch.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

 

An image used in this article, File:Kzinti Patriarch.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 17 September 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Redirect edit

Per the AfD, I am redirecting to the Star Fleet Universe article. This article is trivial and often in-universe, and the subject matter fails to clear the WP:GNG bar. Article history is available for selective merge. Restoration of the article in 2008 should have been reverted, or sustained contingent on significant improvement -- however, changes to the article between AfD and now are negligible and, heck, restoring editor was a sock. --EEMIV (talk) 20:01, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply