Talk:Kyoto Seika University

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Kyoto Seika University. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090414174648/http://www.kyoto-seika.ac.jp:80/eng/3_art/mangaproduction.htm to http://www.kyoto-seika.ac.jp/eng/3_art/mangaproduction.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090426225403/http://www.publishersweekly.com:80/article/CA6637895.html? to http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6637895.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:53, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

List of faculty necessary?

Full disclosure: I'm a member of the faculty. I just deleted a dozen names of people who are no longer with the university. Is there really a point to this section? The faculty changes somewhat every year, and maintaining the list would be a lot of work and of questionable benefit. A list of "prominent past and present faculty members" would make more sense, because you wouldn't have to delete people and you could limit it to people about whom Wiki articles exist or at least English-language online articles exist. Just a suggestion. As it is, this is a queer section. Matt Thorn (talk) 12:22, 22 May 2017 (UTC)