Talk:Kutai

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kutai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061107080534/http://www.kbri-bangkok.com/about_indonesia/history_02.html to http://www.kbri-bangkok.com/about_indonesia/history_02.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:42, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Removed mentions of Cebu and Butuan

The user 112.206.205.236 added a certain contribution on date 15 June 2018, stating that:

Two Hindu nations were known to have had strong trade relations with Kutai, namely, the Rajahnate of Cebu and the Rajahnate of Butuan, both are located in present-day Philippines.

— 112.206.205.236

I checked the mentioned source ("The Indianized States of Southeast Asia" by George Coedès") however two important keywords, "Cebu" and "Butuan", aren't even present in said book. The word "Philippines" only appeared at least three times, with page 240 clearly stating that the expansion of Javanese suzerainty didn't even extending to the Philippines.

The expansion of Javanese suzerainty in the time of Rajasanagara is evident from the list of dependencies of Majapahit transmitted by the Nagarakritagama. Roughly, the kingdom comprised all of what was to become the Dutch East Indies (with perhaps the exception of the north of Celebes) and a great part of the Malay Peninsula, but it did not extend to the Philippines.

— George Coedes, The Indianized States of Southeast Asia

Due to the result of the failed verification process, I am going to delete the claim that is not supported by the given source. Stricnina (talk) 21:33, 11 February 2020 (UTC)