Talk:Kunzea 'Badja Carpet'

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Plantdrew in topic Kunzea badjaensis

Bold move edit

After the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kunzea sp. Wadbilliga, I boldly moved the article from Kunzea sp. Wadbilliga to its current title. --Bejnar (talk) 13:31, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Good work. I'm still concerned that we don't have any sources that link "Wadbilliga" to 'Badja Carpet'; it's too bad the Wadbilliga title didn't get deleted. Plantdrew (talk) 16:05, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
I would have been happier if it had been deleted; unfortunately, I am not sure that it meets any of the criteria at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion. On the plus side, it might prevent the creation of a duplicate article. You're also correct about it being a pity that we cannot find a reliable source for the correlation of the two. --Bejnar (talk) 18:11, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Italics edit

Because there are no parentheses, I could not get Kunzea italised using the Template:Italic title. Is there some other way? --Bejnar (talk) 13:38, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for fixing. I'd forgotten about Template:DISPLAYTITLE. --Bejnar (talk) 18:11, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kunzea 'Badja Carpet'. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:28, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Kunzea badjaensis edit

Would it be better if this articles was combined with Kunzea badjaensis now that the species has been described and a wiki written? Gderrin (talk) 23:25, 6 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

My inclination would be to keep separate articles on the species and the cultivar; mostly because I don't like having redirects from subtopics. But it could really go either way; there really isn't that much to say about the cultivar. Plantdrew (talk) 01:49, 7 November 2017 (UTC)Reply