Talk:Kumihimo

Multiple Issues

1) As mentioned, the article lacks any sources. There seems to be sufficient literature on the subject (as would be expected for a traditional japanese art) considering the number of authors mentioned in the "Kumihimo authors" section. Does anyone have some of these books at hand, or know other reliable sources?

2) The "Kumihimo for beginners" section is clearly a howto. This might be remedied already by changing the person from second to third/passive (which has to be done in any case) and the general style of that section. However, when I try this, I end up using weasel words and making unverifyable statements. Someone with more insight in editing than me?

3) The "rating system" list needs some explanation, or just rewriting into prose (the list is of no use, as it is). Also, the "Related terms" and "Kumihimo authors" sections would profit from some introduction or explanation, though it's not really necessary. They look a little bit unordered and hard to read (single, unexplained terms followed by multiple-sentence list entries?).

Se'taan (talk) 03:10, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Paraphrased the section on the "rating system", though still no references in it. It's not really useful information without any further explanation. Se'taan (talk) 03:22, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

The Kongo Gumi link (under "Related terms") leads to an entry about a Japanese construction company, not to any overview of kumihimi types. Not sure how it should best be fixed. Saffran (talk) 16:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

"History"

The very first thing one should be able to find in "History" is years or eras. Just saying "samurai" is rather pointless. It's a bit like saying: "historical soldier". It can be of any period that had these soldiers or - in this case - samurai. That's a series of periods of about roughly 700 years.

Can someone please give more details about the period the kumihimo first showed up? Thanks! Kennin (talk) 03:44, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kumihimo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://thegenieslamp.com/kumihimo/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060613233500/http://www.rosalieneilson.com/Images/Braids/CW%20Exchange%20InsideOut/Sample-Swap.htm to http://www.rosalieneilson.com/Images/Braids/CW%20Exchange%20InsideOut/Sample-Swap.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:36, 13 December 2017 (UTC)