Talk:Kumawat

Latest comment: 29 days ago by Deep singh kumawat in topic for mutual discussion

Kumawat is a Rajput Caste edit

202.128.111.4 (talk) 18:39, 12 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. —KuyaBriBriTalk 18:44, 12 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 16 June 2018 edit

106.207.249.162 (talk) 18:19, 16 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

(Redacted)

  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. L293D ( • ) 00:07, 17 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

for mutual discussion edit

I "Ekdalian" want to discuss increasing knowledge about Kumawat Wikipedia page. There is no sufficient information bro about Kumawat

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=vm_KCE4XXPMC&pg=PA562&dq=%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%A4+%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%BF+%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%AC%E0%A5%82%E0%A4%A4&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&ovdme=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwisr_uFrOqFAxW6yjgGHQj5CzQ4ChDoAXoECAIQAw#v=onepage&q=%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%A4%20%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%BF%20%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%AC%E0%A5%82%E0%A4%A4&f=falsehTs reference i

is suit for it-able दीपसिंह 16:30, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
K. S. Singh (Popular Prakashan) is not considered as reliable by the community. Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 18:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks....
This is final as our old written evidence.
https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.494949
Should I change the Wikipedia page based on this reference? दीपसिंह 02:48, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Everything written in this K.S. singh'book is true bro. If you were from Rajasthan, you would have good knowledge of our culture bro. दीपसिंह 02:51, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, even if it is true, we can't deviate from our policies regarding use of unreliable source. There's an existing consensus regarding this particular source and we are not supposed to use the same. Please try to find other sources, modern scholarly work by reliable authors. Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 09:40, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
thanks for your time
I will continue my efforts दीपसिंह 12:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply