Talk:Kullaberg

What exactly is this

I was going to add the protected areas infobox to this page; however, I can't find out what this site is. The article claims that it is a 7,500 hectares nature site but the IUCN list of protected areas[1] does not have a matching site out of the 2392 "nature reserves" listed in Sweden. It does have a 868 hectares Östra Kullaberg Nature Reserve and a 474 hectares Västra Kullaberg Nature Reserve and a undesignated site called simply Kullaberg at 1,750 hectares - even combining these three you do not get 7,500 hectares. Rmhermen 20:42, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

there is a complex ownership distribution between the foundation and the government. i have never seen a breakdown of the parcels. i think there is another piece or two of parcelization, but whether the ownership is the foundation, the forestry board or hoganas kommun, i dont know. i think the total is correct since ive examined the map boundaries Anlace 21:17, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

What's extreme with this?

What is the rationale behind including this place in Category:Extreme points of Sweden? It might be the westernmost point of Scania, but that doesn't make it an extreme point of Sweden. -- Jao 11:16, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kullaberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100528121347/http://www.luminatechnologies.org/luminawws.html to http://www.luminatechnologies.org/luminawws.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:15, 8 May 2017 (UTC)