Talk:Krohn Air

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Krohn Air/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 03:38, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 03:39, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The article is reasonably well written and complies sufficiently with the MoS, I made a few minor copy-edits.[1]

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   References look good, RS. Statements adequately sourced as far as I can tell with FoxLingo translate, no OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Sufficient detail

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Stable

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   THe logo has a suitable non-free use rationale

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Good to go, happy to list. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 03:58, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Bankruptcy

The article is partially updated for facts and tense, but the article now has a bare URL. Geschichte (talk) 19:53, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

I have formatted the bare url into a proper ref using the cite news template. Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 21:49, 27 August 2014 (UTC)