Talk:Kris Law

Latest comment: 4 years ago by ToBeFree in topic POV

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --Jomteddy (talk) 09:51, 27 March 2015 (UTC) this person is reputable and currently working as actor to break racial segregation in his country.Reply

I am not certain that this person is reputable and currently working as actor to break racial segregation in his country applies to the Wikipedia purpose of an article. But I do wonder what policy Wikipedia has when a geographic location (I know nothing of this country Malaysia) does not have reputable sources - is YouTube, Facebook, blog sites, etc. allowed as a source? 134.186.234.108 (talk) 00:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kris Law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:41, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

POV

edit

This article is in awful condition: it's riddled with ultra-positive adjectives and most of the sources are either the subject's own website or social media channels. Should be rewritten completely. Kissa21782 (talk) 13:44, 25 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

I have removed the most promotional statements; the main issues, unduely weighted information and positively biased statements likely remain. The article seems to rely heavily on self-published sources, but it shouldn't. Jomteddy, please disclose your connection to Kris Law and do not edit the article directly. You can request edits by clicking "request corrections on or suggest content" in the orange box at the top of this page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:04, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply