Talk:Kraków/GA2

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Pyrotec in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 12:54, 30 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Initial comments

edit

My initial impressions, after skim-reading this article a couple of times, is that: it's comprehensive, wide-ranging and well referenced. I don't yet see anything obvious missing. So, it appears to be GA material.

I'm now going to be spending the next few days going through the article. I will be going through it section by section, but leaving the WP:Lead until last. Depending on what I find, I may only post corrective actions; but we will have a wait and see. Pyrotec (talk) 18:27, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Overall summary

edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


A comprehesnsive, wide-ranging, well-referenced article.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    Well illustrated
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Congratulations on the quality of the article. I'm awarding GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 18:47, 3 September 2009 (UTC)Reply