Talk:Kosh Naranek

Latest comment: 9 years ago by 129.69.215.37 in topic Replace Quote

Untitled edit

Lorien is the FIRST ONE, not first ones. To avoid confusion, I just deleted the "the first ones."Centralk 22:46, 10 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation edit

I think there should be a disambiguation page on Kosh, due to the amount of other pages with the same first name.--Rabbitdude 16:20, 29 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Missing information edit

This article should probably explain the decision to kill off Kosh - was it planned from the beginning of the series, or as a result of the voice-actor leaving, 'etc? Inquiring minds want to know. Raul654 04:10, 4 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Kosh's death was planned from the start. Andrew Swallow 17:45, 26 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Kosh's death was planned from the start-- but the timing wasn't. According to JMS posts on the internet, the original intent was for Kosh to die off later than he did. In terms of the "heroic journey", the death of the mentor is a necessary step. The timing came about at Kosh's request, in a sense. JMS, describing how characters come alive inside the author's imagination, said that Kosh (or rather, his own imaginative voice playing the part of Kosh) "told" him it was time.
More literally, JMS wrote a series of events that naturally flowed into Kosh's death, and the timing proved to be one of those cases where he felt that his literary judgment had improved since he'd first outlined the 5 year arc. Wellspring (talk) 20:30, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ulkesh material does NOT belong here edit

Ulkesh wasn't Kosh. He was misleading Sheridan, and insisted on being called Kosh to hide the real Kosh's death, as confirmed by JMS [1] about him mainly being a "pain in the butt" by not revealing his own real name. Vorlons like the air of mystery about themselves. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Garkbit (talkcontribs) 19:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC).Reply

Agreed. Ulkesh needs a seperate entry. MagicFlyinLemur 21:30, 23 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Ulkesh needs some citation that his name is Ulkesh. It doesn't say this in the whole frakkin series anywhere. Otherwise his name is Kosh, like he said, and thus DOES belong right here.76.231.44.109 (talk) 09:40, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Ulkesh was named in the canon novel To Dream in the City of Sorrows, and confirmed by JMS on a mailing-list posting (text search for "same vorlon"). Geminidomino (talk) 16:37, 11 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
I edited the article for him since there is confirmation. FaithLehaneTheVampireSlayer 00:09, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:B5 kosh01b.jpg edit

 

Image:B5 kosh01b.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Replace Quote edit

The article lists two examples for Kosh's vague answers, one of which is "The avalanche has already started, it is too late for the pebbles to vote." I do not think it is a good example, as this particular statement is - while admittedly very poetic and metaphorical - absolutely clear and comprehensible. I suggest to replace that quotation with other sentences more in line with the first example ("You have always been here."), such as "Understanding is a three-edged sword.", "Listen to the music, not the song." or "(...) Until you are ready." - "For what?" - "To fight legends." 129.69.215.37 (talk) 12:40, 5 August 2014 (UTC)Reply