Talk:Koninklijke Paketvaart-Maatschappij

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Indonesia Low‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Transport: Maritime Low‑importance

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Maritime task force (assessed as Low-importance).

In order to maintain an organized list of cited works, this article uses shortened footnotes for all references to cited works, with the full citation placed in the Cited Works section.

Further information

Per Wikipedia:Citing sources, please continue to maintain the same style of use when adding citations. Footnotes will be altered to fit this article's style if they do not conform to the following rule: All full citations should appear in the Cited Works section, and follow whatever the article's convention is for making footnotes to the cited work. See the article for usage examples. The typical convention for an article is to use a short footnote template such as {{sfn}}, {{harvnb}} but plain text could be the convention to be followed. If you have any questions or problems, please ask on the talk page and someone will be happy to help you. Thank you.

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Koninklijke Paketvaart-Maatschappij. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090525001721/http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/second_world_war/volume.asp?levelID=67910 to http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/second_world_war/volume.asp?levelID=67910

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Koninklijke Paketvaart-Maatschappij. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:30, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Slightly inconsistent citation style edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments2 people in discussion

This article appears to follow the citation style of using short footnotes to all cited works listed in the cited works section. There are a few citations which do not follow this style, so unless there is an objection, those citations will also be moved to the Cited works section, and the sources alphabetized as is typical for articles using this style. A notice on the citation style used in this article has been posted on this talk page to provide assistance to those interested in which style is being used for this article. J JMesserly (talk) 21:33, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

I did a lot of referencing by citing books with short footnotes and citing news inside the text, but that it is obviously not correct. Please change it, so I can see the correct way.Grieg2 (talk) 05:56, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

There really is no one "correct way". The main idea is that it be a rationale that can be consistently followed. For this article, it appears what contributors are doing is making all references non inline as the notice describes. If contributors are ok with that description, I will make them all conform to that rule. If some other rule is desired, I will edit the article to conform to the alternate rule. I don't really care other than the article conform to some consistent rule that other contributors can understand.J JMesserly (talk) 07:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
It appears that this article has the style of providing an organized listing all cited sources in section Cited Works which are then referred to using shortened footnotes. If some other style was intended, please comment below. This confirmation would be helpful because Wikipedia's Wikipedia:Citing sources guidelines recommend that articles have a single citation style applied consistently. Because it is frequently unclear what the intended style for footnotes is, a notice on the talk page stating the intended style will assist editors seeking to maintain high standards for Wikipedia's citations. If there is no objection after a reasonable period for comment has elapsed, a corresponding notice will be placed at the head of the talk page along with similar notices but can be removed while there are disputes.

Further information on this style and considerations for its use may be found in the above note. If after an appropriate time for comment has expired that this is confirmed as the style in use, I or some other citation editors will transform any non conformant citations to the appropriate form.J JMesserly (talk) 00:45, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic