This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi @Inf-in MD, thanks for your contributions. It occurred to me while looking at KLP's wider exclusion list that the ranks of the condemned are pretty extensive, and that some prudence is required when considering what is worth adding, and that there may be a certain wisdom in being quite selective about which divestments to include or not include, lest this article become a list. I'm not speaking specifically to the examples that you just added, though I do wonder if, as a rule of thumb, companies that are not notable enough to already have a page on Wikipedia make for notable divestments. In the March 2019 examples, for instance, WHSP would stand on this basis, but the examples of Texwinca Holding and Turning Point Brands might not. Just a thought. Iskandar323 (talk) 12:11, 23 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I agree, we could remove the red-linked ones that don't have an article. Inf-in MD (talk) 12:14, 23 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
