| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Komet Amps article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Tags
editAnupam tagged this article, here. Let me respond. "More citations" aren't necessary since every fact about Komet is cited--I'll grant you that the Trainwreck epoxy is not, though it's common knowledge. I disagree with its supposed ad-like quality, and you are free to edit it. Fact is, these are among the most expensive and best boutique amps on the market; the sources agree, and I'll be adding a few more that confirm that. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 04:43, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- Dear Drmies, my apologies if Komet Amps are indeed notable. I didn't realize that the article was created by an experienced user like yourself. As a volunteer for the New pages patrol, we get a lot of new stubs that are ads for various products. I'll leave you to the editing on this article! All the best, AnupamTalk 04:50, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- No no, don't give it to me just cause I've been around the block! Feel free to tweak. And I tell you what, I wish I was on their payroll and got a freebie for this. (Look up Trainwreck Circuits--if I could get one of those...well, I'd sell it and pay of our cars.) Thanks, Drmies (talk) 04:58, 6 May 2014 (UTC)