Talk:Kolavia Flight 348

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Airline?

edit

There seems to be some confusion over the name of the airline. Kolavia appear to have owned the aircraft, but Kogalymavia were the operators. Mjroots (talk) 14:05, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

It was my understanding they're the same airline; but with two different names. wackywace 14:07, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
No immediate rush to move article around. All will be clear in a day or so. Mjroots (talk) 14:16, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

"MAK"

edit

The abbreviation "MAK" needs to be clarified, I think. At least the full word should be written. HeyMid (contribs) 17:03, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Would anything really be gained by spelling it out - Межгосударственный авиационный комитет? MAK works fine here. Mjroots (talk) 20:06, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
OK, then I understand why we should abbreviate it – I don't believe any non-Russian-speaking person would understand Russian. HeyMid (contribs) 20:31, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Source

edit

The first source seemingly does not cover the fact that 34 people were injured. Where in that source does it state the amount of injuries? HeyMid (contribs) 17:47, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Some nice progress now, at least. However, the "34 people were hospitalized; 32 with injuries from smoke inhalation and two with burns" part needs another source; the current one does not cover that. HeyMid (contribs) 20:53, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Conflicting reports

edit

As usual, there are conflicting reports about this accident. Did the a/c take-off and suffer a flame-out or was there a fire while taxying. Was it 116 passengers and 8 crew or 117 passengers and 18 crew?

My gut feeling is that the latter case is correct in both scenarios. Fire whilst taxying is borne out by eyewitnesses (BBC source). 8 crew minus 2 (3?) flight crew doesn't leave many cabin crew at all. Source for 117/18 is a Russian ministry, so it should be reliable enough.

Again, no immediate rush to rewrite the article, but this will need to be borne in mind as things become clearer. Mjroots (talk) 22:41, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Like you say, Mjroots, this is a pattern known and expected from any recent aircraft accidents/incidents. For example, when Air France Flight 447 crashed, they were not entirely sure whether the people in the plane had died. Regarding Kolavi Flight 348, hopefully things will be sorted out later. HeyMid (contribs) 23:06, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
I've rewritten the article as it is now clear that the fire occurred during taxy for take-off. The aircraft did not take-off and return to Surgut. Mjroots (talk) 16:59, 2 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

QFE

edit

The QFE is given as 784hPa. This seems improbably low. 86.5.176.168 (talk) 06:54, 24 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Also the translation seems to have mixed up ft and metres. In any case, weather seems to have been irrelevant to this accident, so I removed the entire METAR. 86.5.176.168 (talk) 23:24, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

I've reverted the deletion of sourced info. AFAIK, Russia uses metres for aviation purposes. The figure 784 may well be a misprint for 984, but we go with what the source says. Mjroots (talk) 23:36, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Guesswork and AFAIK is no way to write an encyclopedia. 86.5.176.168 (talk) 07:34, 7 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kolavia Flight 348. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:20, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply