Talk:Koi Kaze/Archives/2024/January

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Incest

Incest? I thought they didn't have a sexual relationship. —Tokek 01:08, 17 July 2005 (UTC)

Well I read the whole manga series and there was no sex. No sex, hence no incest. Hope that's fair enough. —Tokek 20:25, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

They do have sex in the manga. In the second-to-last chapter Koshiro kisses Nanoka and says he's going to buy condoms (to which Nanoka teasingly replies, "I know that you love me, but couldn't you have said it more romantically?"). The final page of the chapter shows a trail of clothing leading to the futon, with their bodies hidden under the blankets. It's not as clearly stated as it was in the anime, but sex happened. -Iscariot, 29 Oct. 2005.

Thats what I was thinking. I'm not sure that the ending of the anime and manga are as different as the article portrays it to be. Not only is there what Iscariot said (pages 176-182 of Volume 5 of the manga), but there are also a couple pages of the two laying in bed naked (not graphic though) at the end of the manga as well (pages 199-200 of volume 5). The insinuation is similar to that in the anime where one doesn't actually see anything, but you know that something happened. FleetAdmiralJ 01:53, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Who here has read the entire manga? I'd like to see the differences elaborated upon, if that's possible. Ladlergo 17:55, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

I think the big issue with the endings is that their tones are very different. (Spoilers) The last episode of the anime series includes several scenes that foreshadow the end of the romance: the Ferris wheel that won't move despite their wishes, the love umbrella carved on the tree that is about to be torn down (by their father's construction company, no less), and the fact that Koshiro lets Nanoka go without saying that he loves her. The manga, in contrast, has a more happy, less ambiguous "love conquers all" ending. This might not be enough to make the endings "notably" different, but it's interesting that the manga creator and the anime production team had very different ideas about the ultimate fate of Nanoka and Koshiro's relationship. 05:56, 21 May 2006 (UTC) Iscariot

Endings not that different, production start date

I just finished reading the manga last night, and I would say that the ending is similar to that of the anime. They're not the same, but they're far from "notably different."

Both seem to be vague enough to let the reader/viewer decide. The manga may be implying more overtly that Nanoka and Kishiro will continue their relationship. I get this feeling not only from the manga end, which simply ends with them just beginning to enter what appears to be a real romantic relationship. There are also the scenes where Kishiro tells Nanoka they could be together in a place far away, and when he tells his mother he intends to never marry.

Does anyone have a reference for the manga publication dates vs. start of the anime production? I'm questioning whether this is true. Ladlergo 13:58, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

First mainstream incest manga/anime for the US?

"Koi Kaze was released on DVD in North America by Geneon in 2005. This is one of the first mainstream anime series about incest — here, a romantic relationship between siblings — to be widely marketed in the U.S." It merely says "one of", what came before it? Or can we change this to be the first? Oh, and hentai doesn't count of course.--SeizureDog 06:27, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

The Angel Sanctuary OAV series was released domestically before Koi Kaze, as was Revolutionary Girl Utena. --Iscariot —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandoz 00:14, August 5, 2006 (talkcontribs)

To Do

To clean up this article, these are some things I plan to do:

  • Add manga table to article with release dates, chapter lists, and summaries - a list of the Japanese kanji titles would be very helpful
  • Add episode list table, for now to article with possible split later, with original air dates, titles, and summaries
  • Rewrite plot after reading manga to actually summarize entire series, not just give a teaser from the first chapter
  • Clean up character section
  • Reference, reference, reference
  • Add reception section

When this is all done, article should at least be able to be brought up to B class. Yay!-- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 07:43, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Love Wind

I redirected this title to the page, if that's the correct translation. Does anyone know if subs have been sold in North America under this title, or do they keep it as Koi Kaze to retain ambiguity? Tyciol (talk) 07:36, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

The English release of the anime has never used that phrase. Its purely a fan translation thing. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 13:32, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Bad redirect.

I was looking for an anime studeo called "Rondo Robe" & I keep getting redirected here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.118.100 (talk) 14:26, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

I was looking for Takahiro Omori, and also got to this page. He may be the director, but he vant be the piece as well. I wonder id it's a bad prank, or lack of trying to create a page for him after making a link. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yusolein (talkcontribs) 21:01, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Someone made a very bad redirect. Tagged it for deletion. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 21:09, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Review(s)

ANN Right turn only manga import review --KrebMarkt (talk) 20:59, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Makoto Yoshimori redirect

Why does Makoto Yoshimori redirect here? I see that he did the music for this series, but why does it not go to his page Makoto Yoshimori (composer) first? SereneChaos (talk) 17:44, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Koi Kaze. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:56, 11 December 2017 (UTC)