Talk:Koh-i-Sultan

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Jo-Jo Eumerus in topic GA Review

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Koh-i-Sultan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:50, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Koh-i-Sultan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tisquesusa (talk · contribs) 05:23, 21 January 2017 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Very complete article about a volcano little known, good job

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Well-written, correct grammar, lead is ok, but could be expanded a bit, lay-out good
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
    Extensive list of reliable references, wording is not copyvio'd, neat
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Complete overview of the various characteristics of this volcano. Enough detail about the rock types, ages and location
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    No bias in this relatively sensitive region between Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    No problems
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    More images could be added, but there are none freely available of this mountain at Commons, so ok
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Compliments for creating an extensive well-written article about a relatively unknown and for Pakistan unusual volcano. Great article.
Hum. @Tisquesusa: seems like the passing has not been registered. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:57, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Reply