Talk:Knut

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Canute v Cnut

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It says here that the anglicised form of Knut is 'Canute': I disagree, and I'm looking for more opinions for or against here. Nortonius (talk) 09:09, 25 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Knut vs. Knut (Disambiguation)

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The disambiguation page seems to be merely a shorter version of this page; the two should be merged. 07:39, 3 June 2008 (EDT)

Not any more. --Againme (talk) 20:22, 28 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Knut, Cnut and Canute are all variants of the same name, I suggest that it is artificial to separate them. I also suggest that the primary meaning is the famous Cnut the Great, the remaining meanings should be dealt with by a suitable disambiguation page. I prefer "Cnut (disambiguation)", but "Knut" (basically the present arrangment) is a tenable alternative. I agree it is artificial to separate "Knut" and "Knut (disambiguation)". PatGallacher (talk) 23:32, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I agree the two pages should be merged. Both serve as disambiguation pages and share a lot of information. --Der yck C. 17:39, 9 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic