Talk:Knowledge-based theory of the firm

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Not a copyright violation (I think?) edit

This page seems to have been coped from http://www.istheory.yorku.ca/knowledgebasedtheory.htm . However, this site releases its contents under the GNU Free Documentation License (http://www.istheory.yorku.ca/) so I see no need to delete it. RicDod 20:35, 8 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Even if the above source is valid, the second paragraph is effectively plagiarized from page 108 (first paragraph) of the first reference listed: Alavi, M., and Leidner, D.E. “Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems,” MIS Quarterly (25:1), March 2001, pp. 107-136. While I'm relatively new here and unsure of what needs to be done, someone should review this... Itstrh (talk) 14:52, 31 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Theory or View edit

There are various references being inserted to support "view" over "theory". It difficult to validate those so can we have some extracts to support the assertions please? --Snowded (talk) 20:24, 23 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Knowledge-based theory of the firm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:29, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply