 | The contents of the Knots and graphs page were merged into Knot (mathematics) on 18 March 2015 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
You/me edit
I don't know how to explain the method more pedagogically than by introducing a sort of teacher's talk giving a lesson to a student. I know the Wiki style manual tells to refrain from using that sort of speech. But I don't quite see a way out without ruining the whole thing. I mean the math behind are quite easy: there is a 1:1 correspondence between link diagrams and signed planar graphs, end of the story. But if you want to have people actually use it in real life, you have to somehow take them by the hand to do it. Christian.Mercat (talk) 14:42, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Probably more appropriate would be a wikipedia page simply stating and explaining the theory, with a link to an external page that has most of the hand-taking material here. Fredericksgary (talk) 03:08, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Seifert graphs edit
I am surprized that only chess colorings are included, not even Seifert graphs.