Talk:Knockloughrim

	Northern Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

A section explaining the spelling change Knockloughrim --> Knockcloghrim would be interesting. //Posted by KM

Knockcloughrim edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Knockloughrim, Knockloghrim, Knockcloughrim and Knockloghrim are the four main spellings of Knockloughrim that i've seen floated about by people.

However as it resides in Magherafelt District Council which on its website http://www.magherafelt.gov.uk/business/business-directory/_filter-town--knockloughrim.php spells it as Knockloughrim, i and everyone else should take this to be the official spelling.

However what makes this more confusing is that another government site: Northern Ireland Neighbourhood Information Service (NINIS), has it spelt as Knockcloghrim http://www.ninis.nisra.gov.uk/mapxtreme/mapcatalogue.asp.

So how do we solve it? I dunno! Mabuska 23:16, 23 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

As a long overdue update, i sorted it out ages ago. Mabuska ^(talk) 23:57, 3 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Article mess edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article needs a serious overhaul to make it comply with Wikipedia standards. The manual of style, lack of citations, and what appears to be original research drags this article down badly and needs seriously amended. I will start trying to make it partially better tomorrow. Mabuska ^(talk) 23:57, 3 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic