Talk:Knetwit

Arguing against Speedy Delete

While I understand this article might not meet guidelines on Wikipedia, this was created as a place as a request of several users of the site, maybe in hopes of providing an unbiased view of the site's services.

That's not the mission of Wikipedia though. "Doesn't meet the guidelines" says it all. If it's that important a topic that it needs external unbiased info, surely there's some reliable source upon which the WP article can base itself? Otherwise you're just writing your own essay, and someone else could claim that it is a biased view too. DMacks (talk) 20:35, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Looking at the article itself (which I probably should have done before writing about it:/, I'm declining the speedy-deletion request. While the article content doesn't really assert much notable, the cited refs are key for me. There appear to be several reliable sources that have in-depth stories specifically about this site. That itself makes the topic notable. DMacks (talk) 20:40, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Formats

Just was on the website, it appears they do accept many different formats of note (not just word and text as the article says) http://www.knetwit.com/knetwit/faq#faq_9 Wstrinz (talk) 21:53, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Knetwit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080927202152/http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2008/aug/16/chattanooga-site-lets-students-park-notes-comments/ to http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2008/aug/16/chattanooga-site-lets-students-park-notes-comments/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:26, 7 May 2017 (UTC)