Talk:Klitschko brothers

Latest comment: 7 years ago by NeoStalinist in topic Praise and Criticism Section

Merger proposal edit

I propose that Klitschko Foundation be merged into Klitschko brothers. The Foundation is the work of the brothers and is not notable to stand on its own - it does however speak to the work of the pair. The entire History section for example talks about the brothers and not the foundation.Peter Rehse (talk) 16:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Support. The brothers appear to be notable as the article about them article attests, and this non-notable foundation article (that was created yesterday) would be best served by existing as information within the brothers article. Prhartcom (talk) 18:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Praise and Criticism Section edit

The praise and criticism section is extremely short and only includes praise. Its true the brothers dominated the era and won a lot of fights. Wladimir is a super hard hitter as well. However their are legitimate criticisms of them that aren't mentioned. From what I understand the fighters are considered "boring" both in and outside the ring. Neither are partially charismatic like Mohamed Ali was with his poetry and trash talking. They fight in a a meticulous and methodological manner which some consider uninteresting too watch. They have also benefited from a relatively weak circuit and are both huge, each is around 6'06" and 240 lbs and they almost always have a size advantage. In fairness, if the opponents they faced were better there is no reason to believe they wouldn't train and fight harder, but its hard to speculate.

NeoStalinist (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

vitaly never lost a fight due to real stoppage, comparison to top fighters edit

en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Vitali_Klitschko&diff=984046928&oldid=984046757 one vs one.tri pod.com

=the match of 21st century: the super fight 2 l/|u|bek productions! edit

www.you tube.com/watch?v=CTZIT2rYgGM