Talk:Kitware

Objectivity Disclaimer

I have edited the article to have a more neutral point of view and inserted additional references to support potentially disputed claims (such as "one of the fastest growing companies"). Additionally, since this neutrality issue has not been discussed since June and the neutrality issues within the article have been resolved, I have removed the POV tag. Kaosterd (talk) 13:57, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Provided references were linked to several statements where citation was desired for. A few optional words that may even possibly be disputed by certain parties were replaced, removed or supported with documentation. Support for the statement "widely recognized" is available largely though the number of scholarly papers written citing products and services lead by Kitware, and therefore, many of the "Additional Readings" may be used as its reference. Having worked with Kitware's products, I realize there is a myriad of publications and derived products that show Kitware-lead projects are indeed recognized worldwide by government and educational institutes, researchers and a variety of other institutions -- thus information stating the company's scale should not be omitted. Sixthfore (talk) 17:01, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Luis Ibanez: I have been working for Kitware since 2002. Although I have tried to be objective when contributing to this page, it is of course difficult to guarantee neutrality when working for the same company. Following the Wikipedia notability guidelines, I removed most of the description of the company, and instead inserted references to secondary references. When editing the Kitware page, I have used non-anonymous login to make clear that this information has not been provided in bad faith.

There are some phrases in the lede of this article that should be removed, such as "one of the fastest growing software companies in the country," "advanced custom solutions for a host of complex technical problems," "widely recognized," etc. They are not neutral and should be replaced with specific facts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.187.29.19 (talk) 03:53, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Read like an advert

This article reads like an advert. Especially the dominantly large Area of Expertise section and the focus on specific products and services and company performance. Statements like "Kitware uses a tight cycle of development, testing and detailed, timely feedback that facilitates rapid development of high-quality software products." are, for example, wholly irrelevant and un-encyclopedic. I realize this article has been edited by Kitware employee(s) trying to present a NPOV, but there's simply too much that still is in this article. (24.150.25.88 (talk) 21:26, 24 August 2011 (UTC))

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kitware. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100402214223/http://www.kitware.com/midasindex.html to http://www.kitware.com/midasindex.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:46, 11 December 2017 (UTC)