Untitled edit

The ISO-639-3 code does not represent the situation of the text.. According to Ethnologue there are two Kitubas both the codes are current.. GerardM 10:51, 30 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

In effect there are 2 ISO-639-3 codes for Kituba - one Congo, one DRC - which are treated here the same (and Ethnologue says are close). The "macrolanguage mapping" of the -1/-2 codes kg/kon (Kongo) does not cover Kituba; in some ways it would be helpful to have such a category covering the 2 Kitubas but that's not something we can solve here.--A12n 03:40, 8 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Tonal? edit

The use of tones, or lack thereof, should be mentioned in the article. Badagnani 08:33, 27 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Relationship with Lingala edit

The relationship (and similarities/differences in origin and use) with Lingala should be developed further. Badagnani 08:33, 27 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ki- edit

It might be "Tuba language"? I suppose "ki-" is a suffix. --219.173.119.57 13:25, 5 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

We lived for many years in the Kituba-speaking Bandundu Province of DR Congo and learned the Kituba language fluently. Ki is a prefix, yes, but an essential one. The language is never spoken of as Tuba, but always as Kituba. Ki is the commonly used prefix to denote the fact that it is a language. Its removal would make the word unintelligible. ~musoniki2~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.2.70.173 (talk) 13:57, 13 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Pronunciation edit

In the "phonology" section of the article, IPA pronunciation is not used - leaving much of it unclear due to the various dialects of English, where the vowels in the words used as examples are pronounced differently amongst English speakers. For example, what does "/i/ is pronounced like the "i" in ski or ring" even mean? The vowel sounds in "ski" and "ring" are different vowel sounds - namely, [i] and [ɪ]. 64.250.228.220 (talk) 00:47, 21 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Bible translations edit

2005 was by no means the first translation of the New Testament. We worked in the Bandundu Province from 1981 to 2006. When we were there, there were already two translations of the New Testament available--an older one modeled on the King James Version called "Luwawana ya Mpa" and a newer, more modern translation called "Kuwakana ya Mpa", both meaning "New Agreement or New Testament." The complete Bible became available in 1990 and is simply called "Bible." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musoniki (talkcontribs) 19:40, 29 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kituba language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:43, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:58, 25 February 2021 (UTC)Reply