Talk:Kit Carson/GA2

GA Reassessment

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Kit Carson

This article is based on the most current materials by distinguished scholars and historians available on the subject. I cannot understand why it would fail GA status. True, the article has been plagued by a self-appointed watchdog who has nothing more to do than damn articles he doesn't like. These damnations are not based on verifiable research but on this watchdog's own biases. The article must move forward to GA status. SeeSpot Run (talk) 20:44, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.