This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This page has been edited to heavily reflect the viewpoint of a single researcher rather than the field at whole. I've removed reference to "porosomes" as they are not widely accepted in the field. I believe this bombastic sentence, which I removed, clearly demonstrates the bias of one of the editors: "Today, the debate over full fusion and kiss-and-run fusion has been resolved with the discovery of the porosome... " Such a strong claim is not reinforced by sufficient publications. TyphonAwake (talk) 16:36, 15 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
