Talk:Kiral

Opposing speedy deletion

I'm failing to see how this fails to meet notability. A reputable source references them, and a brief Google search notes this tribe mentioned on other pages (not counting WP mirrors and mirrors of the NPS site), in reference to the varied tribes of Pashtuns. It's a recognized ethnic group, referenced by a reputable educational intstitution. I fail to see how this falls in the same "lacks notability" category as some Metallica cover-band from Palo Alto. Granted, there isn't much info on them online at this moment, but their existence is testified, and thus I'd say they're worth putting into the Category:Pashtun tribes tree so that the article can be developed further. Stability Information East 2 (talk) 17:07, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Double checked, and an ethnic sub-group doesn't really meet the description of an organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools), or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. It's not a poker club, it's an entire culture consisting of several thousand people. Stability Information East 2 (talk) 17:34, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

I agree that it doesn't fall under that category for deletion. However the article is currently a copy and paste of the source which definitely is a reason for the article to be deleted. Smartse (talk) 18:59, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

As I indicated in the Edit summary (visibible under History): Taken from US federal source, non-copyright. Stability Information East 2 (talk) 06:39, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

I went ahead and removed the db-A7 tag. That is only used for individual people and not groups of people. Also, Stability Information East 2 appears to be right about the public domain status of the source. ThemFromSpace 20:08, 23 March 2010 (UTC)