Talk:Kira Rudik
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Contested deletion edit
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --Ppt2003 (talk) 13:53, 17 May 2020 (UTC) Voice is one of the major political parties of Ukraine and so its leader is certainly a notable individual. Therefore this page should not be deleted. Its previous leader Svyayoslav Vakarchuck is the subject of a wikipedia page .So why should Kim rudyak is not notable while Vakarchuck is ?
Spelling of name edit
She goes by "Kira Rudik" on Twitter, so why is this spelled "Rudyk"? john k (talk) 15:10, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- It is Rudyk because this is how her surname (Рудик) is transliterated from Ukrainian into English - the letter и is always romanized as "y". See Romanization of Ukrainian#Tables of romanization systems. Also she is listed as Rudyk on the English version of the official website of Ukraine's parliament. Rudik would be how her name would be transliterated from Russian. I don't know why she uses the Russian variant on Twitter. Usually Ukrainians make a big deal about transliteration and avoiding Russian... i.e. Kyiv not Kiev, Volodymyr not Vladimir, etc. YantarCoast (talk) 13:23, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:53, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Poor quality recent additions edit
This series of changes were almost entirely detrimental to the article. It is now in generally poor English; the first sentence now implies that she has two different names; her full name is repeated many times throughout the article; she is also frequently referred to by her first name; and there is a great deal of text clearly intended to flatter and promote her. I propose reverting the article to before this series of edits. Btm0942 (talk) 15:48, 10 October 2022 (UTC)