Talk:King of Shaves

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Comments edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Ok, I've added a criticism section (although that might not be the best title for it) with sources. It's a well referenced criticism of the company's financial practices. Now as far as I'm concerned that is the only part of this article which isn't written like an advertisement and I do not have the time to clean it up right now, it's almost all advertising. If IP addresses continue to remove the criticism section of this article without noting their concerns here I will request that this page is protected. This is ridiculous. Great marketing, I have to hand it to them, but ridiculous. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 01:07, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi, my name is Will King, King of Shaves CEO/Founder. I have no problem with "our" page being written in a non-advertising manner, but I take strong exception to A) the criticism tag B) the almost universally negative reference to our shaving bond, which you can find out a lot about via my blog at http://blogs.shave.com/king in june 2009 and finally C) the reference re somersets shaving oil, which i simply don't understand as this has no foundation. i will create an account tomorrow, log in myself, amend where i feel suitable and republish. i am as interested to see factual representation re KoS via wikipedia as is anyone.

Will King —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.155.66.142 (talk) 23:54, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

A) I'm not sure what to do about the criticism tag. It doesn't necessarily seem right but then I can't think of anything better to call that section at the moment. If you can come up with something I would be happy to hear about it. B) Please note that there are almost universally negative references to your shaving bond because negative references to it were published in reliable sources. You can see this from the quotes included in the references at the bottom of the page. There were many more, but I thought two was enough to support the assertion. If you don't feel that this is the case, I will put others in. C) I have asked the IP address who added the references to somersets shaving oil to add sources, or at least explain themselves. They have yet to respond but I am wary about removing the only non-advertising material from this article without giving the editor in question a chance to improve it. Doubly so as most of the article is unsourced.

(As an extra special bonus) D) I will await your edits. I also want a crack at this article when I have the time, so I will probably go in after you and tweak it. I would ask that you not removed the well sourced criticism of the shaving bonds, as this has received a lot of coverage and appears to be important information about the company. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 01:07, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on King of Shaves. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:36, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic