Talk:King County Administration Building

Untitled

Am I the only person who thinks this is a cool building because of the honeycomb windows? --Sugarcaddy 21:56, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

I agree with Sugarcaddy. The "aesthetics" section of this entry is bulls**t (and should be removed, due to its extreme subjectivity). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.129.21.188 (talk) 23:21, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Design

Conversely, this building stands out from the majority of it's neighbouring glass veneered tower blocks due to the combination of a myriad of design elements; the changes in colour of the building materials, the relief of the diamonds and the non-conformity of the windows - an aesthetically and interesting facade of a building, contrary to the description afforded by knowledgeable critics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grove1960 (talk • contribs) 19:40, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on King County Administration Building. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061105041123/http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2003309981_building18m.html to http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2003309981_building18m.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:59, 20 September 2017 (UTC)