Talk:King's Quest II: Romancing the Stones

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Noteability concerns edit

I noticed that someone wiped this page, and merged it into the game it was based on. However, this game has received quite a few reviews in the press, even appearing on G4 TV's Electric Playground. There is even a wiki page for the developers AGD Interactive, and Himalaya Studios. The team even received a fan license from Activision to make the game (see AGD Interactive). This should at least go through a vote, to see if it should stay or be deleted.

I'd also recommend if there is a decision to 'merge' it, it would be better fit to merge it into King's Quest (fan games) or a King's Quest III (fan games). As that article goes into greater detail about information concerning this original remake and many other licensed fan games such as The Silver Lining (video game). I don't think that this material should go into the official games article, as it is very different retelling of the original game (and has very little in common).76.232.176.26 (talk) 02:43, 11 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on King's Quest II: Romancing the Stones. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:17, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply