Talk:Kincade Fire
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kincade Fire article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial comments edit
I'm going to work on expanding this article later tonight. I also have some pictures. Thanks for starting it! Missvain (talk) 15:49, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hey, I'm think of adding an impact section between now and the next two hours or so. Are you planning on doing something large soon and I'll honor the note on top of the section or do you want me to wait? Leaky.Solar (talk) 17:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Do we really need all those "zones" of evacuation? I think it would be equally informative to list just the whole evacuated area. As of 10/28 06:15, it has increased to 200,000 people evacuated. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/10/28/kincade-fire-evacuation-map-expands-sonoma-county/?outputType=amp —Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 13:45, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Evacuation Zone History
Yes, the evacuation zone history is really important and useful. From a historical context (look at this article in 2025), seeing how the Zones were rolled out in stages is key. There will be lots of public policy discussion regarding fast enough? too fast? This kind of information really fits an "encyclopedia." I'd recommend adding back in that information.MikeVdP (talk) 15:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Bar chart containment % not displayed correctly edit
The containment % from 5% to 15% should be in the grey part of the bar chart, not in the red part indicating fir burning. Thanks. Reinhard — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:AB10:5DB0:8521:2DD8:3C36:ACF7 (talk) 17:07, 29 October 2019 (UTC)