Talk:Kim Sawchuk

Title Correction

Hi, I can't find how to correct the title. I tried this: DISPLAYTITLE:Kim Sawchuk. But it didn't work. Obviously "sawchuk" needs a capital letter... — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaudeG3 (talk • contribs) 11:45, 26 February 2015

You'll gain the tool to move pages when you've been here a few days and done some more edits. In the meantime, Done.

The text "Our project" which you included in the article suggests you may be close to the subject. Please be careful. Bazj (talk) 13:20, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Sourcing

I see the problem with the article. Sawchuk does appear to be an important academic in this emerging field, but she cannot be the source of her own page. As I clicked on references what I found is that you imbedded links to neutral sources but did not show them as references. Thus, it appears all references are to sources by Sawchuk herself, or webpages of entities which she has created. Those are unacceptable as sources because of bias. Will try to help you re-work the piece, as it is evident that she is notable, and the problem is in how to show documentation. SusunW (talk) 14:55, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination withdrawn?

Comment by @Kraxler: on AfD is ("nomination withdrawn" is a rationale, not a result, besides, this change is necessary to enable bot parsing of the result for AfD stats) but tag above still indicates "The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn." I do not know if this requires an admin to correct or not. Documenting discrepancy. SusunW (talk) 07:11, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

The result of the discussion was keep, meaning that the article is kept and was not to be deleted. All votes were keep, anyway. "Nomination withdrawn" was the reason why the discussion was closed early, usually an AfD runs for a whole week. I changed the bolded word which decsribes the result of the discussion, at the AfD page because there is a tool that analyzes the votes and results of AfD discussions. "Nomination withdrawn" gives a default message of "UNDETERMINED" which in this case is not correct. The result at the top of this page is stated as "nomination withdrawn", and needs not be changed. "Nomination withdrawn" shows to the experienced Wikipedian that the result was keep, that all or most voters voted keep, and that the nominator himself perceived that the nomination was hasty/mistaken/overzealous/etc. Thus, on this page, "nomination withdrawn" shows more weight to keep the article than an ordinary "keep". Kraxler (talk) 13:27, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for the explanation @Kraxler:. There is so much to learn about Wikipedia. I appreciate your taking the time to explain the process and its interpretation. SusunW (talk) 13:42, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kim Sawchuk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150617193012/http://drexel.edu/mobilities/news/archive/differential-mobilities-begins-today/ to http://www.drexel.edu/mobilities/news/archive/differential-mobilities-begins-today/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:07, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kim Sawchuk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20150412204214/http://web2.concordia.ca/provost/tenure2009/as.shtml to http://web2.concordia.ca/provost/tenure2009/as.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:48, 10 December 2017 (UTC)