Talk:Kim Goldberg

Latest comment: 2 days ago by EarthFurst in topic why in anti-vax categories?
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kim Goldberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:31, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

why in anti-vax categories?

edit

So Kim Goldberg article currently in categories "American anti-vaccination activists", "Canadian anti-vaccination activists" and "Vaccine hesitancy", but I don't see anything in the article about her being anti-vax or vax hesitant. (looks at some of edit history) AH! In August 2023 sources were removed by 205.250.121.91, with (in my opinion) a misleading edit summary. 205.250.121.91 has only done two edits, with the other being another edit of this article with a similarly misleading edit summary (summary being "Got rid of a gratuitous slur.", but switched from an UNsourced POV to another-POV that also UNsourced.) whatismyipaddress.com says that IP location is "Canada", "British Columbia", "City:Victoria". Since Kim's substack says she is "on Vancouver Island, Canada", i wonder if she was using that IP (205.250.121.91). - EarthFurst (talk) 17:22, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply