Talk:Kim Bu-sik

Recent edits: 30 Mar 2015

The recent edit removed links to the existing Wikipedia articles and the only external verifiable reference. It also restored a factually wrong statement: Yejong was a king (and a vassal of Liang), not an emperor, and removed all the political background. While information about Kim's role in development of Korean spirituality is interesting, it was not supported by any sources. Finally, large parts of the new/old text need stylistic and grammatical revisions and should be made compliant with the Wikipedia rules about language neutrality. I'll be happy to keep all the additions of Idh0854 provided that can be properly referenced, and will restore my text. Drterno (talk) 09:57, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Untitled

hmm, is it supposed to be Kim Bu-sik, with a hyphen? Appleby 23:33, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Move to Kim Busik?

The current title of the page is "Kim Bu-sik," the lede starts with "Kim Busik" (no hyphen), and the infobox gives two Romanizations: "Gim Busik" (RR) and "Kim Pusik" (MR). That's four different forms, and the title matches neither the lede nor the two most common Romanizations.

The convention on Romanization of Korean names says we should keep the more common "Kim" instead of "Gim," but that otherwise we should use the Revised Romanization for pre-1945 Korean names. This means we should move the page to Kim Busik. Would anyone object to that? Cheers, Madalibi (talk) 04:19, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Gim Hongdo which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 07:29, 12 July 2018 (UTC)