Talk:Kill or Be Killed (comics)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sagecandor (talk · contribs) 01:29, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I will read this one over and do a review soon. Sagecandor (talk) 01:29, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of June 11, 2017, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: The writing quality is good enough for good quality. Going forwards, I would recommend making sure your lede section is expanded upon just a wee bit more in order to include info on other sections for example like Critical reception, a couple of sentences of expansion should do the trick just nicely here. The article uses an interesting style of Plot, with Synopsis and then Plot. I've never seen that before, but it works nicely here.

2. Verifiable?: The article makes excellent use of citations to confirm the material in the article all over the place. Accuracy is not a concern as verifiability is made easier for future editors and checkers with the citations.

3. Broad in coverage?: Article scope is broad for its particular topic, which includes publication history, plot, synopsis, reception, good intro which would be better with tiny more, etc. Especially nice Production section.

4. Neutral point of view?: Article appears to be presented in an NPOV manner, not seeming overly critical or overly promotional either way, good job here.

5. Stable? Article is stable, not seeing any problems or ongoing edit wars or big talk page arguments, so no issues there.

6. Images?: One image used in the infobox with a fair use rationale there for its use.

Good job overall ! If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it Good article reassessed. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Sagecandor (talk) 01:23, 11 June 2017 (UTC)