Talk:Kieran Maguire
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kieran Maguire article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 14 June 2020. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article was tagged for speedy deletion under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion but a reviewing administrator or uninvolved experienced editor (DESiegel (talk)) declined the request on the basis that: There are multiple claims of significance here, including the book, the university awards, and the podcast. None of which says that this would be found notable at an AfD, of course.. This article should not be tagged again for speedy deletion under the same criterion and, unless a valid, separate speedy deletion basis exists, further attempts at deleting this article should be made via the proposed deletion process (prod) if uncontroversial, or the article taken to articles for deletion (AfD) for debate on the merits. Note: this template should be removed once the associated article has survived an AfD debate; or has been significantly changed such that further speedy deletion requests are unlikely. |
Questionable notability edit
Subject does not seem to be notable and most of the 'awards' does not seem to be verifiable. For example, the stament "The podcast had a quarter of a million downloads within its first five months.[4]" leads a 404 page. The rest are self-initiated whether it interviews or because of self-publications. — Infogapp1 (talk) 14:59, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Here’s the link you questioned, works fine for me https://www.prolificnorth.co.uk/news/broadcasting-news/2020/03/football-finance-experts-podcast-gets-250k-listeners-five-months Hildreth gazzard (talk) 15:23, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Contested deletion edit
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because meets notability guidelines with respect to the media Wikipedia:Notability (media) and Wikipedia:Notability (periodicals). Subject is considered by reliable sources to be authoritative in their subject area. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hildreth gazzard (talk • contribs) 11:20, 14 June 2020 (UTC)