Talk:Keweenaw Brewing Company/GA1

Latest comment: 1 year ago by LunaEatsTuna in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 17:56, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copyvio check

edit

Earwig says good to go. No concerns from me either.

Files

edit

The image is relevant and problem-free:

  • File:Keweenaw Brewing Company logo.jpg: good, valid non-free reuse rationale—displayed in low resolution.

Prose

edit
  • I think the lead could be expanded slightly, maybe by adding a couple of key points in the KBC's history?
  • There is enough information for me to justify adding an infobox.
  • In the lead, the sentence starting "It is named for the detached Keweenaw Peninsula" is not mentioned in the body.
  • Wikilink Denver, Colorado.
  • "despite not serving food." – why would this not make it successful; is food often served at other breweries?
  • "In 2007, the brewpub" – wikilink brewpub.
  • The efn note: "while a news article in 2014" – I would name the publication.
  • "They began canning their beer in the same year," – recommend "They began canning their beer that same year,"
  • "and Michigan's Lower Peninsula." – wikilink Lower Peninsula.
  • "the brewing company inked a deal with" – is inked correct? I personally have not heard of the word.
  • Could Recognition and beer be expanded upon at all? It is a fairly short section, and for a brewer of this size I wonder if there has been anymore coverage elsewhere. Relatedly;
  • The last major addition was added in July 2021. Have there been any updates since then?

Refs

edit

All sources are RS. Two URLs are links to YouTube videos, however their uploaders are RS news outlets. Passes spotcheck—no concerns with refs 2, 8, 9, 12, 14 or 17.

Other

edit

Short description, See also, External links, nav and cats good.

Hello again LunaEatsTuna! As before, I appreciate the thorough review. I've completed my responses to your points with points or exceptions noted below.
  • On the name, it's a bit of WP:SKYISBLUE#Citing everything territory for me. I haven't seen a reference that pinpoints the origin of the name, unlike Blackrocks Brewery or Ore Dock Brewing Company, but at the same time neither of those two are named for the rather large geographic region they inhabit. (That's probably why no one's seen fit to spell it out.) I'm happy to remove this if you insist.
  • In that case, it should be fine to remain.
  • Inked is indeed correct... but it appears to be an Americanism, which isn't ideal! See point 2a under the verb-specific definitions. I've changed the word to "signed."
  • Re: recognition and beer, I wish! My theory—unconfirmed—is that Houghton gets a bit of a short stick when it comes to local media coverage. All the large media outlets in the Upper Peninsula are headquartered in Marquette, the largest city in the region, and that same place is a shorter drive for Lower Peninsula news outlets. And for brewery-specific coverage, Blackrocks' brews have long been more of a cult favorite.
  • That aside, I've added a quote from Blackrocks' founders, who credit Keweenaw with blazing a trail that they were able to follow. I've also added a list of their core beers, using an older source for the names and a so-so source to confirm that it's still true even a decade later. Every other beer review that I can find online is less reliable than that; unfortunately Keweenaw hasn't been named as an MLive "beer of the week" or similar.
  • Ah, I see. Thanks for the reference though!
  • Noted.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.