Talk:Kevin Downes

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Janet1983 in topic Defending the page for Kevin Downes

Defending the page for Kevin Downes edit

Kevin Downes is mentioned with the Six: The Mark Unleashed. He is the producer and an actor in the movie... Why in the world should it need to be deleted?
Nobody would come up with the idea of deleting the page about the other actors like David A.R. White and Stephen Baldwin. He didn't only act in the movie, he produced it, directed it wrote it and acted in it...
He is not really a nobody...
Clean it up if you wish, but removing it would be a little too much...
I wrote this article after reading the articles of other actors... I put in all the information I could get on him and I put in a list of the movies he has acted in, directed and written... This is not new to a page about an author, actor or director...
Janet1983 19:12, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

  • Steven Baldwin, for instance, has dozens of screen credits, many in significant, mainstream productions, and is a member of a famous acting family to boot. They're not remotely comparable, even leaving aside WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS.  Ravenswing  19:41, 6 October 2008 (UTC)Reply


And David A.R. White? You can't downplay one and not the other... Both have various achievements and one article is not being disputed (and it is older) while the other is... All I did was looking at comparable other articles and set up the new one. David A.R. White was actually one of the pages I used for the set-up... He was nominated for his participation in Mercy Streets (2001) which is produced by Kevin Downes and nominated for the Best Family Film Award... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Janet1983 (talkcontribs) 23:01, 6 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Out of the 13 movies Kevin Downes acted in 7 have an own page in Wikipedia... All so small? Out of the 10 he produced 6 have a page on Wikipedia... 2 out of 2 movies he wrote are being recognized... As a production manager he did 2 movies out of which 1 is mentioned... The movie he directed is mentioned... The fact that there is not a greater mass in information available online cannot be a reason to delete the article. There are shorter articles out there... We can call it a stub and hope for more info, but deleting it is an overreaction... Janet1983 23:16, 6 October 2008 (UTC)