Talk:Kerosene lamp

This Page Needs Tidied Up

It reads like a heated, informal debate between a crowd of oil lamp enthusiasts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.57.186 (talk) 03:22, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Methanol

Question: Can't methanol also be burned in these things? If not, why not? User:Mordac 21:18 5 April, 2006

• According the information I could find, a flame produced from burning alcohol is a very dim and blue in color. In fact, it is so dim that under normal lighting conditions the flame is almost invisable. Alcohol more useful as a cooking fuel. See sterno. Bige1977 04:39, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

• User:Bart J. Meijer In some of them, alcohol could be burned, there has been a mantle lamp produced by the Germans that could burn it. Also pressure lamps like the Petromax have been made to run on Alcohol, Petrol and Kerosene.
• There even have been very succesfull Wick Fed Vapour Lamps been build by Tito Landi, The LampeTitus could safely run on Naphta as well as Alcohol.

Other oils

No reason that other oils couldn't be used, I'm sure. I think vegetable and whale oils were widely used prior to the 20th century. A history section, or links to appropriate articles, would be useful.

I'm curious whether other oils (vegetable oil) would have the same health impact? I suspect there would be only a partial improvement. --Singkong2005 ^{(t - c - WPID)} 09:23, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

• User:Bart J. Meijer In most cases vegetable oil can not be used, or only a very short ime. With wick lamps, the top of the wick gets so hot that the fuel will undergo a breaking process, leaving hard carbon at the top of the wick. That will cause the lamp to stop burning in minutes. The viscosity also is a problem, the vegetable oil doesn't run well in a normal wick, so the lamp will starve when the fuel level drops.
• In pressure lamps it has been tried to burn vegetable oil, however the same breaking process will cause the vapourizer to clog very fast with hard carbon crystels. The lamp will damage beyond use in a matter of hours.

Health risks

Any health risks (apart from fire) to burning "generic" lamp oil in a kerosene lamp in a tent all night long, while camping?

Michael

Soot is, of course, an irritant. In a tent, carbon monoxide poisoning is unlikely, but keep it in mind. And, as you point out, fire and burns are, of course, always a hazard with any combustion lamp.

Atlant 18:53, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Jet fuel has lead in it ,not a good idea. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.168.96.165 (talk) 16:43, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

You are mistaken. Although I don't see where he mentioned Jet fuel. Aviation fuel for piston engines however does have it (eg 100 LL where "LL" stands for low lead). Jet fuel does not. "Jet aircraft and turbine-powered, propeller aircraft do not use avgas, but instead use fuels very similar to kerosene, which does not contain a lead additive."

Greenhouse impact?

Below is an extract from Light Up the World Foundation and is also relevant here - can anyone add more info? I'd like to see the claims backed up by more than just the one person in one paper. --Singkong2005 ^{(t - c - WPID)} 09:25, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

The LUTW website cites a Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory paper, which argues that replacing kerosene lamps with LED lights helps reduce greenhouse gases. The paper says:

The single-greatest way to reduce the greenhouse-gas emissions associated with lighting energy use is to replace kerosene lamps with white-LED electric lighting systems in developing countries; this can be accomplished even while dramatically increasing currently deficient lighting service levels. - Mills, 2002[1]

However it should be noted that Mills does not discuss the one-off contribution to greenhouse gas emissions from the production of components such as solar panels.

Merging Petromax with Kerosene Lamp

Hi All,

I would like to ask not to combine Petromax with Kerosene. We have added a lot to the Petromax article.

A group of historic kerosene lamp collectors, are working on adding a lot of articles to make a complete vieuw on the time that Kerosene, Petrol and Alcohol lamps were used. We are going to add in the future:

• Aladdin Mantle Lamps
• Pigeon Lamp
• Vapalux Pressure Lamp
• Famos Mantle Lamps

If someone wants to join this group of Historic Lamp Collectors, they are more then welcome to. Please send a note to me

With Regards, Bart J. Meijer 21:54, 1 January 2007 (UTC)Bart J. Meijer

Hi all,

We’ve being updating the Petromax section so I have to agree with Bart on this, the Petromax section is in realty a huge German company that really need to be updated with lots of other information.

Skeeves 22:12, 1 January 2007 (UTC)David

Yes, certainly it is possible to complete this article. The Petromax is not the only pressure lantern in the world. Someone will probably write about the excellent British Tilley or Bialaddin/Vapalux, or about the American Coleman kerosene/gas lantern, present all over the world since the beginning of the XXe century ! (Gerard : Pressure lanterns) Camulogene 11:00, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

I think Petromax should keep its own page. Tilley lamp and Coleman Company have their own pages so why not Petromax? Biscuittin 15:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

John Irwin

Shouldn't somebody write about John Irwin's contribution to the development of the kerosene lamp? I'm no expert, but I heard he invented the tubular lamp design.

Social History

How does a section get added? I think a social history section would be useful, especially for writers and people who do reenactments.

For example: "By 1856 Kerosene was used to light homes in New York (gas came to that city in 1864.)" http://www.mts.net/~william5/history/hol.htm —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kim333 (talk • contribs) 19:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC).

British english

This subject deals with a number of phenomena which expose differences between british and american (and other) english language and culture. this article has a particularly british sound to it and i think some work needs to be done to provide local equivalents for specific vocabulary relating to the nomenclature for the oils and distilled fuel products and the manufacturers and resultant regional colloquialisms. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Miltonhowe (talk • contribs) 04:02, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure to which sections you refer. To me it seems more American in emphasis. I would support either but we should adhere to WP:RETAIN and WP:ENGVAR because the article does not have a strong national tie. MartinezMD (talk) 00:19, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Dangers section Dubious

I removed this text because it doesn't appear to be true, based on the Catherine O'Leary article. However, there may yet be truth to the statement that it inspired the Safe bottle lamp. --Mdwyer (talk) 16:03, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Kerosene lamps can cause fires if knocked over. The city of Chicago burned down when a cow kicked a kerosene lamp over into a haystack. This inspired the invention of the Safe bottle lamp, to avoid this hazard.

Kerosene smoke can also cause health problems, especially respiratory problems, and especially if used in enclosed spaces. [2] However, most lamp oil sold today is "ultrapure" and not a hazard when used in candles and oil lamps.

Polish invention in 1853?

So the Kerosene lamp belongs to Category:Polish inventions[3]? No other country used oil lamps before in 1853 the modern Prometheus Ignacy Łukasiewicz enlighted mankind? Besides, he was a citizen of the Austrian Empire. -- Matthead  Discuß   11:20, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Lukasiewicz contributed to the technology of oil refinery. He did create a lamp, but it was not much different from the vegetable oil lamps of his time. The flat wick kerosene burner was developed by Rudolf Ditmar of Vienna, from whom John H. Austen, sales manager of the North American Kerosene Gas Light Comany took it back to the States in 1856. Production on basis of that burner started in America the next year by Dietz and then many others. (Peter Cuffley, Oil and Kerosene Lamps) The popular Kosmos-type round-wick kerosene lamp was developed by German makers in the 1860's, and the duplex burner by Hinks and Son of Birmingham in 1865. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gasolier (talk • contribs) 18:13, 31 May 2010 (UTC) Gasolier (talk) 18:16, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Globalize

this article treats kerosene lanterns as an historical curiosity, whereas they are widely used in developing countries. Their total energy use is similar to the total energy use in residential electric lighting, if you compare worldwide totals for each. To globalize this article, it needs to greatly increase the emphasis on where kerosene lamps are in fact used today. Ccrrccrr (talk) 21:32, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Hot blast and cold blast tubular lamps

I removed the statements about hot blasting cold blast being brighter than simple lamps. They were unsourced, and I found the following indicating that that is a myth: [4]. That's not a reliable source, so I won't put anything in the article claiming that tubular lamps aren't as bright as ordinary wick lamps, but nor should we have claims to the contrary without any evidence. My reading of the original hot blast lamp patent is that there was not a coherent idea of exactly how it should work or what it should accomplish, and I think that the cold blast lamp patent reflects the design that emerged once Irwin figured out what the real advantage of a tubular lantern was. And that patent clearly explains that the advantage is not greater brightness, but just robustness against flame disturbance from air currents from wind or moving the lantern around. One other reference of interest is this advertisement for the hot blast lamp, which indicates that the same robustness against disturbance is a key advantage. [5] Ccrrccrr (talk) 14:45, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Pressurized lamps

We need to describe the pressurized kerosene lamp with Welsbach mantle - this is a very important type for lighting in areas without grid electricity. Looking for refrencences now... There's also literature on the economic and health drawbacks of kerosene lamps vs. other forms of lighting. --Wtshymanski (talk) 16:07, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kerosene lamp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029192016/http://www.lanterns.us/faqs.htm to http://www.lanterns.us/faqs.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:37, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Where is Robert Dietz?

I came here after reading "Life's Engines" by Paul Falkowski. He mentions that the kerosene lamp in America had been developed by Robert Dietz. Robert Dietz may not have been the first person to think of the kerosene lamp, but he may have been the first to patent one. See https://www.lanternnet.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Store_Code=WKL&Category_Code=Dietz-Lanterns for more information about Robert Dietz and the kerosene lamp.

I was surprised to find no reference to Robert Dietz at all on Wikipedia, even though his company, R.E. Dietz supplied kersone lamps in America for nearly a hundred years before moving off-shore. Dietz lanterns continue to be sold to this day.

References

Unique and sole inventor

So Gesner invented a process for producing kerosene in 1846, and accumulated barrel upon barrel of the stuff, secure in the knowledge that a European pharmacist would one day invent a lamp that could use the product? Say again? --Wtshymanski (talk) 02:44, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Didn't Argand invent the oil lamp with a wick? --Wtshymanski (talk) 02:46, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Looking for a diagram of what Lukasiewicz invented, which none of the many cites show. Would be interesting to see what elements changed between that invention and what was later sold. Also, we needed to explain that although there were many other oil lamps, this one worked better with the low-viscosity mineral oil cmpared to those intended for thicker vegetable oils. --Wtshymanski (talk) 02:12, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

You seem confused as to what the title and scope of this page is.

Did Gesner invent a kerosene lamp? No. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:36, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

What's confusing about "Gesner invented a process for producing kerosene in 1846," a few lines above? --Wtshymanski (talk) 04:59, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Gasification

I removed sections that talked about gasification. I suspect, perhaps, that this was someone translating from a foreign language and used gasification instead of vaporization. Gasification involves typically converting a solid carbon fuel source (such as wood or coal) into combustible gasses. MartinezMD (talk) 05:55, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Inbound traffic from youtube

FYI on 20210616 a youtube video about these such lamps included this page (~23:08), may attract new editors. — xaosflux ^Talk 01:27, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Global kerosene lighting usage

I don't have access to the source that says kerosene lamps consume 77 billion litres of fuel per year, but two sources I can access say the number is 7.6 billion litres per year.[6][7] Can anyone explain the discrepancy? Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 04:01, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

@Clayoquot: here is what the reference has to say:

20.6.2 MDG 7: Ensure Environmental Sustainability

The main aim of the project is to reduce fossil fuel consumption for lighting. It is estimated that fuel-based lighting such as kerosene lamps consumes 77 billion liters of fuel annually throughout the world, equivalent to 1.3 million barrels of oil per day (LBL 2005). The average daily bum time of one kerosene lamp per household is 3-4 h, which sums up to around 40 L of kerosene consumed per year.

— xaosflux ^Talk 10:19, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

It could certainly be outdated. — xaosflux ^Talk 10:20, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

I found the problem and it looks like our article is correct - the first source I found above, Lam (2012), references Mills (2005). Mills gives a figure of 77 billion L per year, so it looks like Lam miscopied it. However, the 77 billion L figure is for all forms of lighting fuel - "kerosene, diesel, propane, biomass, candles, and yak butter." Kerosene appears to be the main one. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 16:59, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

So, uhm, since this factoid has been sufficiently neutered, is it really so relevant to this article, or at least the lede section, anymore? Also, dead link for the jet fuel source, so I can't check this: is there a source that correlates Factoid #1 with Factoid #2, or is this WP:SYNTH? Elizium23 (talk) 03:04, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Neutered to be less than 77 billion litres - that's quite a picture!

I don't have an opinion on whether these figures should be in the lede, but I think they do belong in the article. I've done a bit of reading about lighting in parts of the world that don't have electricity, and kerosene always comes up as the alternative.

Good question about whether there is a source correlating kerosene lighting and jet fuel usage. I don't know of any source that supports this comparison, although the number for jet fuel usage does seem to be correct.[8] Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 23:30, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

I don't think it's synthesis to compare two mathematically similar numbers. It isn't stating an unsupported conclusion or extrapolation, but simply stating a mathematical fact. I admit that the analogy is imperfect, but one wouldn't call the various orders of magnitude pages synthesis just because they tabulate similar data near one another and box them accordingly. While there is certainly a comparison drawn in this article that makes it slightly different, it's still only a comparison, rather than an argument to support a conclusion. Especially, I found that fact fascinating, useful, and quite educational. --66.183.200.123 (talk) 15:39, 20 October 2021 (UTC)