Talk:Kero Blaster
Latest comment: 9 years ago by PresN in topic Proposed merge with KeroBlaster
_%22BIG_GOMEZ%22.svg)
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Proposed merge with KeroBlaster edit
Seemingly the same game. George Edward C – Talk – Contributions 16:48, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- Ok, so I didn't even know there already was an article on Kero Blaster 0.o I've been looking all over too. "Kero Blaster," "Gero Blaster" and "Pink Hour" all redrected back to Pixel. On Pixel's article, Kero Blaster wasn't a wikilink. It's like the person who made KeroBlaster (since when is it even titled like that?) attempted to hide the article on purpose... Well, I definitely support such a merge, though we'll just have to see how we can combine the two articles. KeroBlaster currently only really has a reception section, so we guess we should just basically copy everything that is deemed reliable per WP:VG/S and try to encorparate it nicely into the existing prose.
- Right now, this article includes every source of KeroBlaster except for the Pocket Gamer review and that Dutch review. I speak Dutch, so it won't be much of a hassle to use these as well. However, the Dutch review can't be found on WP:VG/S and I wonder how much value we can even get out of it in the first place. It doesn't really say anything different from the other sources and we have plenty of sources to chose from. ~Mable (chat) 10:08, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- Briefly included the Pocket Gamer review. Once we have decided what to do with the Dutch Inside Gamer review, KeroBlaster can be deleted :) ~Mable (chat) 10:14, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- Right now, this article includes every source of KeroBlaster except for the Pocket Gamer review and that Dutch review. I speak Dutch, so it won't be much of a hassle to use these as well. However, the Dutch review can't be found on WP:VG/S and I wonder how much value we can even get out of it in the first place. It doesn't really say anything different from the other sources and we have plenty of sources to chose from. ~Mable (chat) 10:08, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- I don't think this needs to be discussed. The RS use the title with the space, so this is the best title, and it's fuller than the "existing" article, which is close to a copyvio in that it is all quotes and no paraphrasing. Coin made a few articles like this, though I thought they all were deleted. Anyway, redirect that title at will. I don't think anything needs to be merged since Mable's Reception is sufficient. (This said, this article too can do with fewer quotes and more paraphrasing.) czar ⨹ 13:55, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- Indeed, I was unsure at the time of proposing, but now I'm certain that these are the same game. George Edward C – Talk – Contributions 08:13, 31 January 2015 (UTC)