Talk:Kepler-9d/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Jezhotwells in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 22:23, 21 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:24, 21 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Checking against GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Well written, I made a few minor copy-edits
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Sources check out, RS, no OR
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    AS much as is known at present about an object 650 parsecs away.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    None used, though images such as those in 9b & 9c would be good. Not a GA criteria.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    OK, good to go -careful taht you don't run out of exoplanets! :-) Jezhotwells (talk) 22:38, 21 March 2011 (UTC)Reply