Talk:Kenny Easley/GA1

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Secret in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 08:22, 1 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Comments

GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Many prose-related comments above.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Some topics not covered (see comments).
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

I'll put this "on hold" pending resolution of the comments. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:22, 1 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please let me know when my comments have been resolved. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:37, 25 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
My apologizes, my computer has been overheating and turning off randomly the past month or so and because of a massive money drain my most recent illness a few months ago costs me, I am currently lacking the funds to replace it. That is why I am/was unable to focus on one particular thing on the present moment that takes me more than 30 minutes like content work or GA reviews (I had literally finished one GA review and about to click save when my computer turned off, losing the review). I should be able to finish your concerns by tomorrow, as I will be in the University the whole day (and not using my fried laptop). Secret account 00:32, 1 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
No worries. Ping me when you're done. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:21, 2 August 2013 (UTC)Reply