Talk:Kenneth Woollcombe
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Ronhjones in topic Requested move
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Kenneth Woollcombe appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 March 2008, and was viewed approximately 350 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Merge Kenneth John Woollcombe
editYes I agree Bashereyre (talk) 14:06, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- Two points:
- The article that I started at Kenneth Woollcombe was about three times longer than this one, but basically none of the content there - [1] - was included when it was "merged" here.
- In the absence of anyone else called Kenneth Woollcombe, surely the article should be under that name. Both of the broadsheet newspaper obituaries call him "The Right Reverend Kenneth Woollcombe" without mentioning his middle name.
- -- One pound (talk) 22:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Was this resolved? -- Secisek (talk) 21:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
- I merged the material in myself, but I think we need an admin to effect the page move. -- One pound (talk) 00:22, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Ronhjones (Talk) 00:12, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Kenneth John Woollcombe → Kenneth Woollcombe — He is found without his middle name, so, since that title is available, he should be at Kenneth Woollcombe DBD 10:28, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.