This article was nominated for deletion on 26 March 2019. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
The sources from The Daily Signal and The Weekly Standard would count towards WP:GNGif they presented significant coverage on Kenneth Preston himself. However, these sources (as well as the other linked sources above) are focused on the investigation mentioned here. Regarding Kenneth Preston, it is not true that each of these sources addresses the topic directly and in detail (per GNG). Therefore Kenneth Preston does not pass WP:GNG. On top of that, this falls squarely into WP:BLP1E. If a new article is created specifically about this investigation, then this material can be merged there instead.
Any thoughts? If not, I'll go ahead and perform the merge. — MarkH21 (talk) 23:43, 19 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
