Talk:Kenneth M. Pollack
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hi -- you removed the section of the article Kenneth Pollack on his connection to the Israeli espionage scandal, with the edit summary "Polack was not indicted. The case was recently dropped, so not clear what to report.". The text you removed did not claim that Pollack was indicted. If you feel that the wording could be taken to imply that he was, the right remedy would be to improve the wording and not to remove the entire section. I cannot find anything on the Web about the case being dropped -- do you have a source for this? Why do you believe the case being dropped is an argument in favour of deleting this section? Joriki (talk) 13:03, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- The indictment was dropped: [1]. The removed text did not say explicitly that Pollack was indicted, but one could be mislead into thinking that he was indicted (e.g. the headline "US government indictment"). Also it is not clear at all, and the source does not help, what was claimed regarding Pollack in the indictment. So the combination of all these factors leads me to conclude that there is no place to report the issue. Mashkin (talk) 13:14, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- So change the title. The section is valid until you bring a source showing an update on Pollack. By your reasoning, you can bring any web article to any WP article and remove material based on what is not your source. That itself is misleading. Once again, YOU decide what belongs in an article and what does not. Mashkin, You are not the WP:OWNER of this article.--Shuki (talk) 16:12, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
I would argue that his book, _Arabs at War_, is miscaracterized. It is not primarly about "the foreign policy of six Arab nations," but rather, as implied by the title itself, about the performance of the Arab militaries in combat. Anyone looking for foreign policy insight in that particular book would be sorely disappointed. Chris — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.255.211.95 (talk) 21:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Kenneth Pollack and nuclear Iran edit
This site:[JP] has an article from an Israeli newspaper about this subject.An Kenneth Pollack tells something about the nuclear program of Iran.Agre22 (talk) 15:02, 24 November 2009 (UTC)agre22
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kenneth M. Pollack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051029171531/http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/006362.php to http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/006362.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:38, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Trimming excess and obsolete External Links edit
I am removing several external links that seem outdated; If anyone can re-incorporate them into the article in a beneficial way, please do so.