Talk:Kennedy Space Center Launch Complex 39
Latest comment: 2 years ago by TJRC in topic NAB?
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kennedy Space Center Launch Complex 39 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
|
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
New SpaceX Crew Walkway
editCan anyone update the article with information and/or a picture of the new SpaceX Crew Walkway on Pad 39A? UnknownM1 (talk) 00:13, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Splitting out LC-39A and LC-39B to separate articles
edit
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- There is no objection on splitting. Therefore, it is clear that we should split the article as suggested by Jadebenn. --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 05:14, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
I think both of these pads are notable enough to have their own articles. The content on this page could be replaced with a more condensed summary and a link to the newly-created main article. This would help avoid the issue of one section dominating over the others, as the section on LC-39A does now. – Jadebenn (talk · contribs · subpages) 22:37, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- I have added split templates to the page and am now only seeking to split out LC-39A. – Jadebenn (talk · contribs · subpages) 18:52, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support splitting per nom. --Soumyabrata stay at home wash your hands to protect from coronavirus 13:18, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
"Complex 39" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Complex 39. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 10#Complex 39 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 09:28, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
NAB?
editThe small image showing the original layout of the pads has a caption near the VAB for "NAB", which appears to be two smaller buildings by Futch Cove. Anyone have any idea what these are/were? Maury Markowitz (talk) 16:52, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- "Nuclear Assembly Building", where nuclear reactor power systems were planned to be installed. It was never built. ([1], [2], [3]). TJRC (talk) 21:19, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Nice, thanks! I assume this was for the NERVA-related stages? Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:52, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- I'm guessing so, based on the third reference, but I don't know much about that program. TJRC (talk) 21:38, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- Nice, thanks! I assume this was for the NERVA-related stages? Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:52, 30 June 2022 (UTC)