This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
This....is the girl who did the voice of Lana Lang in the Superman cartoons? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.146.125.214 (talk) 22:56:32, August 18, 2007 (UTC)
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
An anonymous user at 165.234.253.57 (I'll call them "IP 57") added much of the current article's campaign-like prose ("...bringing accuracy, transparency and technology...", "...worked hard to...", "Always believing..."). On November 1, 192.91.235.243reverted the page to its previous state. IP 57 then restored the puffy language. Seeking a third path, I modified the article earlier today, keeping the objective claims, but toning down the fluffy language. IP 57 reverted those edits as well. Can we editors talk about this and agree that the current language violates Wikipedia's NPOV policy, even if we don't agree on each others' exact verbiage? --LinkTiger (talk) 17:12, 3 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
